User:Winhunter
Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.
| Languages | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Search user languages |
| Userbox | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Search user languages |
| No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
Articles I...
[edit]Created
[edit]- Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China
- Higher education in Hong Kong (Translated)
- Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Translated)
- Learn from Dazhai in agriculture
- University Grants Committee
Expanded significantly
[edit]My other accounts
[edit]- WinBot (BRFA · contribs · actions log · block log · flag log · user rights)
- Winpublic (talk · contribs · count) (For use in public computers)
My bookmarks
[edit]
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 66.231.4.34 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:55, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:07, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- 151.40.10.2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 21:12, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- 87.116.183.188 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 21:16, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]
- Absoluterizzlerrfc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- STEW5Tkyebkjabchwdebcjhbwd (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- TALLYHALLSUCKSAFF (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "sucks" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:30, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Stevie May Official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Digbick6999 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) Anagram of sexually vulgar username ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 18:26, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Aurangzebra (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Resembles a play on the word Aurangzeb and Zebra. It may cause disruption by offending editors, especially those from Pakistan.source Did alert the user but they choose not to respond and go on with their editing. Thanks, 𝓔xclusive𝓔ditor Ping Me🔔 08:08, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- @ExclusiveEditor Despite the fact that this editor has discussed pejoratives and slurs on Wikipedia, I don't thing Aurangzeb is either. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:05, 31 January 2025 (UTC)- @Ahecht: Aurangzeb is not a slur, I never said that. Few in Pakistan praise him, and thus making a joke on his name may not be appropriate, that's my concern. 𝓔xclusive𝓔ditor Ping Me🔔 17:18, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- @ExclusiveEditor Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Consider opening a community discussion at Requests for comment/User names. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:26, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- @ExclusiveEditor
- @Ahecht: Aurangzeb is not a slur, I never said that. Few in Pakistan praise him, and thus making a joke on his name may not be appropriate, that's my concern. 𝓔xclusive𝓔ditor Ping Me🔔 17:18, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- @ExclusiveEditor Despite the fact that this editor has discussed pejoratives and slurs on Wikipedia, I don't thing Aurangzeb is either. --Ahecht (TALK
- CSR00 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See User:CSR00/sandbox. MCE89 (talk) 15:15, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- @MCE89 "CSR" is a generic term in this context, and their username does not contain the name of the company "CSR-A". --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:06, 31 January 2025 (UTC)- Ah, makes sense. I had read "CSR00" as being close enough to "CSR-A" that it was likely to suggest an affiliation with the company, but I see your point about it being a generic term. Apologies about that! MCE89 (talk) 17:13, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:26, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, makes sense. I had read "CSR00" as being close enough to "CSR-A" that it was likely to suggest an affiliation with the company, but I see your point about it being a generic term. Apologies about that! MCE89 (talk) 17:13, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- @MCE89 "CSR" is a generic term in this context, and their username does not contain the name of the company "CSR-A". --Ahecht (TALK
- Valentina gui music (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Aqurs1 (talk) 15:44, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Could be discussed with user to remove 'music' and tell them about WP:PROMO. I have done so. 𝓔xclusive𝓔ditor Ping Me🔔 16:11, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not a violation of the username policy. Stage names and pen names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. @ExclusiveEditor, do not use {{uw-username}} and then immediately report here. This page is for blatent violations, {{uw-username}} is for borderline or edge cases only. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:24, 31 January 2025 (UTC)- I did not report them. But if you mean I should not have used {{uw-username}} after they are reported, I get it, thanks, 𝓔xclusive𝓔ditor Ping Me🔔 18:40, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ardizi Design (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – This is a violation as clearly a promotional username. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 17:54, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- @ScrabbleTiles
Wait until the user edits. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:00, 31 January 2025 (UTC)- Is this true for all reports? ScrabbleTiles (talk) 18:02, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- @ScrabbleTiles See the box above.
Except in the instance of an egregious name violation, please do not report accounts with no edits or those who have not edited in the preceding 2 weeks.
andPromotional names require evidence to be blocked. Do not report a username merely because it "appears" promotional.
(evidence usually means that they have edited promoting the same company their username represents) --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:17, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- @ScrabbleTiles See the box above.
- Is this true for all reports? ScrabbleTiles (talk) 18:02, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- @ScrabbleTiles
- STRUTAUTO (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See userpage. ⟲ Three Sixty! (talk, edits) 20:28, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- TALLYHALLSUCKSAFF (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. User has one edit, which is obvious vandalism. ℰmi1y⧼T·C⧽ 20:29, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Chenabfabrics (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See User:Chenabfabrics. Tenshi! (Talk page) 21:02, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Partisan/political stuff. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 04:22, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please enforce WP:CT/AP. IanDBeacon (talk) 04:52, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- The talk page for Gulf of Mexico is supposed to allow auto confirmed users to edit the Gulf of Mexico article. To ECP the talk page kills virtually any activity for the article page. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 05:24, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Nobody is proposing ECP here. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:42, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It looks like semi-protection is OK for now ... I'm not seeing a lot of reverting going on. Daniel Case (talk) 19:01, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Nobody is proposing ECP here. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:42, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- The talk page for Gulf of Mexico is supposed to allow auto confirmed users to edit the Gulf of Mexico article. To ECP the talk page kills virtually any activity for the article page. SimpleSubCubicGraph (talk) 05:24, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP disruptively reverting/edit warring back to article rather than recent redirect of the article, despite the many problems brought up (by myself) regarding the article at Talk:List of Monster Jam episodes#Convert to redirect. IP has doing nothing to fix any of the issues brought up, whether any of the massive amount of unsourced content or downright incorrect information. Please let me know if this would preferred to be reported elsewhere, such as AIV, ANI, or AN3. Magitroopa (talk) 06:51, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated BLP violations. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:11, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Due to high traffic, requesting page to protected a bit longer to protect from disruptive IP edits. Imcdc Contact 07:23, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- hey.goodafternon.sorrry.i.im.daleyd over im trubolshoting 216.247.28.171 (talk) 08:09, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive edits and addition of unsourced content by IPs for a long time. Media Mender 📬✍🏻 08:17, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 08:28, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism again by various Indian IPs adding/replacing to their promotional website (bollywoodfever). Article already protected twice in January 2025, requesting for longer this time round. — 🧧🍊 Paper9oll 🍊🧧 (🔔 • 📝) 08:40, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated IP vandalism since the start of the year. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 09:03, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 11:27, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: I have continued to see this: anonymous users continued to add false information to this article such as unconfirmed cast members and composers. The Media Expert (talk) 13:08, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. GPL93 (talk) 13:29, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Creation protected Actually only recreated once, but I have no high hopes that this won't be recreated again. Lectonar (talk) 14:25, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost nonstop vandalism, pending changes does not seem to be working. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:37, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mellk (talk) 14:02, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs appearing to change nationality. Mellk (talk) 14:04, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Naniwoofg. Borgenland (talk) 14:16, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Naniwoofg. Borgenland (talk) 14:16, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This page requires better protection due to possible and expected vandalism, bot attacks and spread of misinformation. Please consider semi or fully protecting this page. Thank you! Sremsky (talk) 14:18, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please enforce WP:CT/EE. IanDBeacon (talk) 18:49, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
+1 Reason: Government corruption and misinformation. Changing the leaders of the protests falsely to "Ustase" and blaming the protests on Croatia. The correct leaders of these protests are Students. The current president party is paying people to change the wiki page along with national television programs to lie and divide the people. Focus of the protests is demanding justice - regardless of the political party / current party in power.
Please lock this page. 193.221.198.106 (talk) 15:51, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Dr vulpes: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:40, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
+2 Reason: Untruthful edits made for the purpose of provoking the ones organizing the protests 188.90.120.19 (talk) 15:59, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:14, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. Director of a movie nominated for 13 Academy awards, and the movie is also very controversial. jolielover♥talk 15:13, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 16:04, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Several IP users have been re-adding an unsourced, and possibly fabricated, political-party infobox to this article about a NYC neighborhood. Epicgenius (talk) 16:07, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IP 158.140.182.96 keeps vandalizing the page over many days DACartman (talk) 16:46, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ongoing and repeated IP vandalism and removal of cited content. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 17:15, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:CT/GG. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 17:35, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS (vandal has also been indeffed). Daniel Case (talk) 19:05, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistant sockpuppetry, editor went by name User:Unklabwebmaster and now is going by the name User:LPM UNKLAB. Catfurball (talk) 17:37, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please consider a longer protection period. Aqurs1 (talk) 18:00, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – persistent unsourced number changes & other disruption by IPs. it's hard to verify the numbers because the Russian census is pretty inaccessible and difficult to navigate, but i think it's correct right now. ... sawyer * he/they * talk 18:01, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks keep re-adding hoax information about a nonexistent movie ("Looney Tunes: Let's Play School") to the article. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 18:28, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:10, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Most edits in the past 1/2 month are vandalism, unsourced edits, or reverts of other edits. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:30, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Add that 80 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed since the “ceasefire” began (i.e. genocide direct deaths have continued albeit at a slower pace) https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/death-and-destruction-returning-to-rafah https://news.antiwar.com/2025/01/29/israeli-forces-have-killed-more-than-80-palestinians-in-gaza-since-ceasefire-went-into-effect/ Seahumidity (talk) 09:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Add info about 35 year reduction in life expectancy according to UPenn study http://www.thedp.com/article/2025/01/penn-study-gaza-life-expectancy-drop Seahumidity (talk) 10:53, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Create an article about the song "Loco" by Netón Vega. MC-123 (talk) 15:38, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- @MC-123: Onus is generally on the person who wants the article to create it, not random editors on a noticeboard. If you think you have the sources to support an article, then see WP:WIZARD to get started. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:26, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 1 protected edit request | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 20:16, 31 January 2025 (UTC) |
| 4 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:08, 31 January 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request auto-patrolled rights on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the project and have created more than 30 of articles to date, which adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe my experience and attention to detail make me a good fit for this role. Granting me auto-patrolled rights would help reduce the workload on other patrollers by automatically marking my new pages as reviewed. Please feel free to review my contributions and articles to ensure they meet the necessary standards. Let me know if any additional information is required. Thank you for considering my request! Needforname (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right because I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia and believe that my experience and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines make me a suitable candidate for this right, I have created over 25 articles, all of which comply with Wikipedia's notability guidelines and content policies. My contributions have consistently aimed to enhance the quality and reliability of the encyclopedia. I believe that granting me the autopatrolled user right will help reduce the workload of new page patrollers and allow me to continue contributing to Wikipedia more efficiently. Thank you for considering my request. Ahola .O (talk)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights I have created almost 50 articles and whilst producing these articles I have developed my understanding of wikipedia policies, conformed with the rules for biographies of living persons and have improved the content and formatting of numerous articles. SDGB1217 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
I’m requesting Autopatrolled rights for my account. I have contributed a significant number of edits, and my contributions are well-sourced and meet notability standards. I believe this rights would help my workflow and reduce the load on reviewers. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 12:56, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
The editor has written 176 articles, with only two being deleted. Their work is well-researched, notable, and meets the encyclopedic standards. Given their track record, I believe they can be trusted to patrol their own articles. Garuda Talk! 13:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
It is my 8th year of editing (4th with this account). I have written a number of articles of various types and none have been permanently deleted. I have made mistakes, but understand what they were and how to avoid them. Ivan (talk) 17:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit] |
| There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
|---|
Confirmed[edit] |
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
Hello, long time user of Wikipedia here, with a relatively new account which has less than 500 edits, while I was working on translating an article about an Israeli nurse and women's rights activist שרה לשנסקי (Sara Lishansky) from Hebrew to English. I noticed that I was only able to publish my translation as draft, What are my options in this case? AsmarTiba (talk) 11:06, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'd like to translate some articles that are currently only available in Russian and not in English. The machine translation feature is not yet available to me, but I'd like to help in that area. Ivan 6 (talk) 08:08, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
Requesting to extend my NPP flag. I enjoyed reviewing redirects and articles. Thanks GrabUp - Talk 07:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
I've been Wiki-editing since 2018 and have become a familiar face on the snooker project. I'm accustomed to creating articles and redirects, and I'm fully conversant with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I've co-nominated three articles for FAC (all promoted) and contributed to many other FACs. I've been a pending changes reviewer since May 2020, and I like to think I am fair and neutral in any discussions that I get involved in. With over 24,000 main space edits to my name, I've been quite an active editor over the years, and I think I could make a useful contribution as a New page reviewer. Rodney Baggins (talk) 13:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
I think I meet all the criteria, I have been an editor for more than 6 months, I have over 3000 edits, I have participated in more than 50 move requests, and I've never been blocked. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Recently active back at RM for the past three months after being extremely active many years ago. I was brought to MR twice in 2013 & 2015 and in both cases my closure was endorsed. I have !voted recently in most of the recent months of MR and always aligned with consensus. Spent the last three months getting reacquainted with the changes in policy and approaches to RM's and have started to perform some closures. Would appreciate the bit to help reduce the need for CSD#G6 and/or RM/TR to complete some of these moves. Thanks! TiggerJay (talk) 08:47, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
I’m requesting rollback tool to help with vandalism fighting more effectively. I’ve been active in counter-vandalism work and have a good understanding of policies like WP:VAND and WP:AGF. While I’ve made mistakes in the past, I’ve taken the feedback onboard, slowed down, and focused on making more accurate judgements. Rollback would allow me to handle clear vandalism more efficiently without cluttering edit histories. I’m committed to using it responsibly and only for obvious cases of vandalism, leaving more complex issues for discussion or reporting. Thank you for considering my request. Footballnerd2007 • talk ⚽ 17:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
I am re-requesting rollback after being denied around the end of December for not being consistent enough in RC patrol to meet the criteria. I understand that now and have come back with hopefully having reverted obvious and blatant vandalism more consistently over the past month. As always, I assume good faith, and when it comes to recent changes, if I see something that I'm not quite sure is vandalism or not, I won't undo it. I am well-versed in the different warning templates and when to use each one, and I know when it is appropriate to report to WP:AIV. Rollback will help me quickly undo the very obvious and problematic vandalism that I might catch on RC. Fishy-Finns (talk) 19:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights I mainly spend my time on Wikipedia correcting non-constructive edits and vandalism, as well as notifying users. The majority of my edits are minor changes or changes to users' talk pages. I'm requesting rollback rights so that I can better use some of the anti-vandalism tools available to me. Thanks for your time. CivilianArthur (talk) 20:44, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting rollback rights because I spend most of my time on Wikipedia reverting vandalism, and I would like to help fight vandals more effectively. I have made some mistakes, but I mostly have a good understanding of Wikipedia policies, and I try to always WP:AGF. Rollback will also allow me to use tools like AntiVandal. Thank you. Protobowladdict (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Some newbie editors contain IP address not their username editing wrong and fake information even if is not the area origin. Vineyard93 (talk) 10:47, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have been working on counter-vandalism with RedWarn for a while now. Despite my inconsistent and relatively low edit count compared to other requesters, I believe I would be a good fit. I approach CV with the idea that it is better to have somebody with malicious intentions get away with their behavior than it is to accuse an innocent person of Vandalism. I aim for high accuracy over total reverts. I have made mistakes in the past but I am usually quick to notice and fix them. The main reason I am requesting Rollback is to gain experience with the Huggle desktop application. Thank you for the consideration and I look forward to hearing back. UndeadAnarchy|✉ 14:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request rollback permission to help combat vandalism, particularly in Nepal-related articles, which I frequently come across while patrolling recent changes. Having rollback rights would allow me to efficiently revert obvious and disruptive edits, improving the quality of affected pages. I always assume good faith and am careful when reviewing edits. If I am uncertain whether an edit is vandalism, I do not revert it. I am also familiar with Wikipedia’s warning templates and know when it is appropriate to report persistent vandals to WP:AIV. I believe rollback will be a valuable tool in my efforts to maintain Wikipedia’s integrity, and I will use it responsibly. Thank you for your time and consideration. Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:49, 30 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor[edit]
Hi. I would like to request the rights to edit certain templates, such as the {{piechart}} template and its associated module, important when its usage increases. I want to have these rights in advance so I can apply fixes when needed. I am already a sysop on pl-wiki and an interface admin on several wikis, including meta-wiki. See more on my page: User:Nux. In real life, I am a library systems programmer with professional experience in WCAG and hold a certificate in web accessibility, which is useful for certain aspects of template development (colors, structure). I also work on gadgets and CI/CD scripts, such as Wikipedia:Wikiploy, which, while less relevant to templates, demonstrates my programming experience — an important skill for working with Lua modules. Oh, I did read the guidelines. I even translated them into Polish; it didn't gain traction on plwiki, but at least now I know them :) Nux (talk) 20:37, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
|
Immediate requests
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
| Requests for unblock | 24 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 3 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion | 33 |
| Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 1 |
Deletion
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Articles for deletion | 583 |
| Templates for deletion | 134 |
| Categories for deletion | 470 |
| Wikipedia files for discussion | 80 |
| All redirects for discussion | 463 |
| Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 26 |
| Possible copyright violations | 26 |
| All articles proposed for deletion | 341 |
| All files proposed for deletion | 17 |
| Unsorted AfD debates | 0 |
| All files with the same name on Commons | 5 |
Image copyright problems
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Orphaned non-free use | 435 |
| Unknown copyright status | 70 |
| Unknown source | 30 |
| No non-free use rationale | 2 |
| Replaceable non-free use images | 15 |
| Disputed non-free use images | 39 |
Page protection
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Protected | 10 |
| Semi-protected user and user talk pages | 1,275 |
| Fully protected user and user talk pages | 448 |
| Protected against vandalism | 4 |
| Protected talk pages of blocked users | 34 |
| Semi-protected | 2,284 |
| Arbitration 500/30 restricted | 0 |
Cleanup
[edit]|
General cleanup | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| All pages needing cleanup | 34,532 | 0.5 |
| All articles needing rewrite | 6,091 | 0.09 |
| All articles needing expert attention | 1,341 | 0.02 |
| All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 40,450 | 0.58 |
|
Reference problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All pages needing factual verification | 11,304 | 0.16 |
| All articles with unsourced statements | 539,329 | 7.76 |
| All articles lacking sources | 69,148 | 1 |
| All unreferenced BLPs | 17 | 0 |
| All articles needing additional references | 478,150 | 6.88 |
| All articles needing references cleanup | 4,654 | 0.07 |
| All articles lacking in-text citations | 105,699 | 1.52 |
| All articles with dead external links | 281,408 | 4.05 |
|
Image cleanup problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
| Wikipedia files lacking a description | 136 | - |
| Wikipedia files with unknown source | 18 | - |
|
Other problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All articles to be merged | 1,271 | 0.02 |
| All articles to be split | 833 | 0.01 |
| Unsorted Stubs | 1 | - |
| Stub categories | 19,309 | - |
| All uncategorized pages | 616 | 0.01 |
| All orphaned articles | 54,708 | 0.79 |
| All articles needing copy edit | 2,317 | 0.03 |
| All articles with style issues | 19,300 | 0.28 |
| All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,767 | 0.04 |
| All articles that may contain original research | 16,568 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Requested moves | 430 |
| All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 6,763 |
| All accuracy disputes | 15,758 |
| Articles with invalid ISBNs | 1 |
| Articles with invalid ISSNs | 4 |
| All articles to be expanded | 65,927 |
Special pages
[edit]| Maintenance reports | Information |
|---|---|
| Broken redirects | |
| Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
| Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
| DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
| Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
| Long pages | |
| New pages | New page patrol |
| New pages feed | Page curation |
| Protected pages | Protection policy |
| Short pages | |
| Uncategorized | Categorization |
| Uncategorized cats | |
| Uncategorized templates | |
| Unused categories | |
| Unused files (images) | |
| Unused templates | |
| Without interwiki links | |
| Most interwiki links |
Sub-page listing
[edit]Hong Kong
[edit]
Misc
[edit] Delete
|
 Keep
|
 Neutral
|
 Oppose
|
 Support
|
 Note
|
 Template
|
| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Winhunter. |
| Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0 | ||
| I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides. | ||